I chose to look how Wikipedia discusses the events that unfold in the Indian Ocean on December 26, 2004 because I have limited knowledge of twitter. The 2004 tsunami devastated regions in the Indian Ocean affecting millions of people in many different countries. I am not sure how Wikipedia addresses the event as it was unfolding, so I am going to discuss what was done afterwards.
Wikipedia explains the events of that day in great detail. It breaks down the events that led up to the fault line rupture in great detail. It goes above my basic knowledge of earthquakes and their power.
Wikipedia has several different graphics on the characteristics of the tsunami. The most interesting was the propagation of the tidal wave as it moved across the Indian Ocean. Other graphics cover a wide range of statistical data and historical facts.
Wikipedia also mentions the rebuilding processes and the humanitarian aid. The rebuilding process has been hindered by separatists in some areas. Other areas have been hindered by countries not fulfilling their pledges.
This type of media provides the public with an up to date Encyclopedia. Before this type of media Encyclopedia’s where published every few years and the information was always dated. This evolving knowledge base keeps the general public informed. My biggest concern about this type of information is the belief that it is peer reviewed. I am not sure of the guidelines for writing or reviewing an article. Another concern to beware of is the qualifications the writers or the reviewers hold. When a hard copy is published from a magazine or professional journal there is someone to hold accountable. This trend of media is going to be around long after print goes the way of the Dodo.
Friday, April 2, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment